Memo-Documents

Support Documents Menu

Note – Documents may open in a separate browser tab.

Magistrates Court 1987 – Roadworks Tylden RD

• Summons
• Notice of Defence
• Letter Piries to GT – Change from Rates Claim to Work & Labour done
• Letter Council to Laurens re advice
• Notice of Discovery – Council to GT
• Notice of Discovery – GT to Council
• Summons to give evidence – Lance Nichols
• Summons to give evidence – Ross Nichols
• Affidavit of Documents – GT
• Bundle of Documents provided by Council at Court door – Notice Locality Plan fraudulently represented as Plan of Subdivision
• Extract – Court Register

Supreme Court Appeal – Roadworks Tylden Rd

• GT Affidavit
• Council – Wilson Affidavit
• Bundle of Documents provided by the Council
• Reasons for Judgment – Justice Kay
• Reasons for Judgment — Requirement was a requirement to construct roads
• Reasons for Judgment — No Requirement empowering Council to hold or call upon Guarantees

John Norman Price and Greg Garde and the Administrative Tribunal

• WHRD to GT re Planning Permit
• Notice to Pay October 1987
• John Norman Price Affidavit
• Envelope dated 11/12/87
• File Note – Peter Nevile – Price
• Photo-1 – Bourke St Post Office
• Photo-2 – Bourke St Post Office
• Notes of conversation GT with Postal Manager and Postal Clerk
• Fax GT – Price – Proposed submissions to Tribunal
• Written Submission — Garde
  • Page 4 of above
• Written Submission – Lonie
• Valuation A T Cocks
• Valuation GD Sutherland 1988
• Valuation GD Sutherland 1992
• Valuation O’Briens 1995
• Law Institute

1988 County Court proceeding – Tylden Rd

• 1991 Amended Statement of Claim
  • Paragraph 7
  • Paragraph 20

1995 Supreme Court – Woodleigh Heights

• 1995 Writ
• 1999 Amended Statement of Claim (this Statement of Claim is a mess because Garde deceived Justice Ashley into a belief that the was no such thing as a Deed of Assignment)

2005 Supreme Court

• Efthim Hearing
  • Amended Statement of Claim
  • Affidavit Steven Mark Edward
  • Affidavit Steven Mark Edward Further Affidavit
  • Afidavtit Steven Mark Edward Second Further Affidavit
  • Affidavit Michelle Elizabeth Dixon 23/09/05
  • Affidavit Michelle Elizabeth Dixon 28/10/05
    • Paragraph 4 of above Affidavit — Michelle Elizabeth Dixon introduces her “Understanding” embryo of “true lies”
    • Paragraph 5 of above Affidavit — Michelle Elizabeth Dixon demonstrates complete version of plans discovered
  • Affidavit Michelle Elizabeth Dixon 10/11/05
  • Affidavit GT 18/10/05
  • Affidavit GT Reply Security for Costs
  • Affidavit GT Second
  • Affidavit GT Third
  • Affidavit GT Fourth
  • Outline of Submissions – Delany for Council
    • Paragraph 17 of above
    • Paragraph 22 of above
    • Paragraph 36 of above
    • Paragraph 50-52 of above
    • Paragraph 53 of above
    • Paragraph 54 of above
    • Paragraph 64-67 of above
    • Paragraph 68-71 of above
    • Paragraph 86 of above
    • Paragraph 87-8
  • Outline of Submissions – Garde for Water Authority
    • Paragraphs 1-7 of Above
    • Paragraphs 45-52 of Above
  • Outline of Submissions – Middleton for GT
    • Pages 10-11 of above
  • Book of Pleadings
    • Page 3
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 17
    • Page 31
    • Page WB2
  • 1991 Amended Statement of Claim
    • Paragraph 7
    • Paragraph 20
  • Transcript Day 1 – 14/11/2005
  • Transcript Day 2 – 15/11/2005
  • Reasons for Decision
    • Paragraph 55 of Reasons — see last 3 lines
  • Orders & Judgment

• • Osborn Hearing
    • Notice of Appeal – Judgment
    • Notice of Appeal – Orders
    • Outline of Submissions – Delany for Council
      • Paragraphs 74-81 of above
      • Paragraph 82 of above
      • Paragraph 85 of above
      • Paragraphs 94-98 of above
    • Outline of Submissoins – Garde for Water Authority
    • Appeal Submissions – Part 1 – GT
    • Appeal Submissions – Part 2 – GT
    • 1991 Amended Statement of Claim
      • Paragraph 7
      • Paragraph 20

      Transcript Day 1 – 31/10/06

    • Transcript Day 2 – 1/11/06
    •  
  • Osborn – Judgment Day – 29/11/2006
    • Transcript — NO ORDERS
    • Transcript — NO ORDERS – Last Page – see last lines – No – Orders
    • Reasons for Judgment
      • Paragraph 184 of above
  • Osborn – Costs Orders Day 7/12/2006
    • Costs Submission – Garde – for Water Authority
    • Costs Submission – GT including Ehibits
    • Transcript – Last Page – Three Orders

Steven Mark Edward – False Affidavit

• Affidavit of James Prosser-Fenn, Solicitor
• Affidavit of Sharron Hill
• Affidavit of Cheryl Gersbach
• Photo Internal Staircase to my backdoor which Steven Edward Came up
• Photo My internal Back Door
• Looking inside Back door to Laundry Area where Steven Edward Came through
• Trestle Table referred to by Edward looking toward my kitchen
• Trestle Tables looking southerly direction Edwards Photocopier was set up where Woman is standing
• My Bedroom Visible
• My Bedroom
• My front door towards fire escape
• My front door looking from fire escape
• Looking down fire escape from my front door area
• The door which Edward used from time to time from fire escape and took his boxes of documents
• Edward parked his vehicle in the driveway here to load boxes of documents from up and down fire escape to my front door

Court of Appeal

• Fraudulently Fabricated “Authenticated Orders” of the Supreme Court
  • Osborn’s Reasons for Judgment – Handed down 29/11/12 — See paragraph 184
    • Paragraph 184 of above
  • Transcript 29/11/06 — NO ORDERS
    • Last page above — NO ORDERS
  • Transcript 7/12/06 — Note:- 3 Orders
  • Edward Letter enclosing Fabricated “Authenticated Orders” and asserting my Appeal filed out of time
  • Fabricated Authenticated Order of 29/11/06 — No orders made that day – Order Consists of paragraph 184 fraudulently merged with 2nd Order of 7/12/06
  • Fabricated Authenticated Order of 7/12/06 — Note this Order Omitts the first two orders made on 7/12/06
  • Master Cains Orders
  • Further Fabricated Authenticated Order purportedly issued under the “slip rule”

• Master Lansdowne
  • Practice Note No 2 1995
  • Lansdowne Orders 3/12/07
  • Lansdowne Orders 14/2/08
  • 35,000 pages of Appeal Book
  • On arrival at Essendon
  • Delivered to Court of Appeal
  • Delivered to Maddocks
  • Delivered to Mason Sier Turnbull

• Security For Costs Application — Justices Buchanan and Redlich
  • Outline of Submissions – Garde for Water Authority
  • Written Submission GT
  • Transcript
  • Orders

• Indemnity Costs Application – Justices Neave and Mandie
  • Summons
  • Outline of Submissions – Garde
  • Affidavit Steven Edward
  • Affidavit-Submission GT
  • Neave and Mandie — Reasons for Judgment
    • Exhibits by GT
      • 1 Application for Permit
      • 2 Written submission Council and Water Authority to Administrative Tribunal
      • 3 Council Working Paper PP2191
      • 4 Planning Permit 2191
      • 5 Application for Permit – Dwelling Lot 9
      • 6 Application for Permit – Cluster Redevelopment
      • 7 Planning Permit 2784
      • 8 Building Permit Lot 164
      • 9 Letter – March 1981 Applying for Water – Body Corporate
      • 10 Engineers Report re proposed water supply to Woodligh Heights
      • 11 Water Board Minutes 1/4/81 – Transcribing Engineers Report
      • 12 s.186 Water Act
      • 13 Notice of Disposition – Tylden Rd lots 6 & 16 Sold 7/12/80
      • 14 Palmer Stevens & Rennick file crooked plans
      • 15 s.8A Sale of Land Act
      • 16 Hansard – Rylah Local Government Act and s.9 Sale of Land Act
      • 17 Hansard – Rylah – Sale of Land Act
      • 18 Letter AGC to Council 29/11/84
      • 19 Letter Council to AGC 20/12/84
      • 20 Letter Water Authority to AGC 7/12/84
      • 21 Letter Garlick & Stewart to Water Authority 20/2/85
      • 22 Water Authority Minutes 6/3/85
      • 23 Government Gazette 27/03/85
      • 24 Letter AGC to Water Authority – 9/4/85
      • 25 Water Authority Minutes 1/5/85
      • 26 Plan Extending Water Authority Urban District – Sealed 8/11/84
      • 27 Plan Diminishing Water Authority Urban District – Sealed 1/5/85
      • 28 Letter Water Authority to AGC 3/5/85
      • 29 Letter – Water Authority to Department Water Resources – Including Plan sealed 1/5/85
      • 30 Letter – Water Authority to AGC 7/5/95
      • 31 Governmentt Gazette – July 1985 – Urban District Diminished
      • 32 Letter GT to John Norman Price 26/02/88
      • 33 Written Submission – Garde to Administrative Appeals Tribunal – 7/3/88
      • 34 Letter Steven Mark Edward to GT – Appeal Out of Time – Fraudulent Authenticated Orders
      • 34b Fraudulent Authenticated Order 29/11/06
      • 34c Fraudulent Authenticated Order 7/12/06
      • 35 Letter – John Middleton QC to GT 17/02/06
    • Ehibits from Appeal Book
      • Statement of Claim 1988
      • Defence 1988
      • Amended Defence 1988
      • Re-Amended Defence 1988
      • Amended Statement of Claim (1991) 1988
      • Further Re-Amended Defence 1988
      • Indorsement to Writ 1995
      • Plan Cluster Subdivision
      • Plan Cluster Re-Development
      • 30th Schedule Notice – Tylden Rd with 18 lot plan and handwritten note on schedule and plan
      • Water Supply Agreement – Woodleigh Heights
        • Page from above — install meter and fill tanks intermitently
      • Woodleigh Heughts Brochure
      • Ninth Schedule – Registered by Registrar of Titles – Residential use.
      • Osborn Reasons
      • Outline Delany – Before Efthim
      • Outline Garde – Before Efthim
      • Outline Garde – Before Osborn
      • GT Submissions before Osborn – Part 1
      • GT Submissions before Osborn – Part 2
      • Contrived Plans – Tylden Rd – Residential and Industrial
      • Submission refered to in Woodleigh Heights Planning Permit condition 8
        • Page from above — supply own water
      • Fraudulent Water Supply Agreement – Woodleigh Heights
      • Transcript before Osborn – Day 1 – Pages 43-44
      • Transcript before Osborn – Day 2 – Pages 192-193

• Indemnity Costs Application – Redlich & Beach
  • • Outline – Claim for Indemnity Costs – Ahern for Council
    • Outline of Submissions Delany & Co – Before Osborn
    • GT Outline in opposition
    • GT-Submission
    • GT Submission Addendum
    • Affidavit – Michelle Elizabeth Dixon – 23/09/05
      • Page 6 of above
    • Affidavit Jaqueline Sue Partridge – in support of Indemnity Costs
    • Book of Pleadings
      • Page 9 of above
    • Woodleigh Heights Planning Permit 2191
    • Fist and Fifth Schedules to Cluster Re-Development – “Residential”
    • Reasons – Redlich & Beach

Rates Claims

• 1987 Rates Claim
  • Demand
  • Summons – $4,426.36
  • Notice of Defence
  • Notice of Discovery Feb 88
  • Letter – Claim reduce to $3236.07
  • Letter to Council – No Discovery will seek chamber summons
  • Pre-Hearing Conference 22/03/88
  • Affidavit in Support of Chamber Summons – 8/7/88
  • Affidavit in Support of Chamber Summons 16/8/88
  • Backsheet – Order Council serve Affidavit of Discovery 1/9/88
  • Request for Further & Better Particulars
  • Notice of Hearing 14/7/88
  • Letter Council to GT – Claim reduced to $1,492.39
  • Affidavit of Documents – Council
  • Letter Jurat signed 4/11/88
  • Extract Court Register

• 1991 Rates Claim
  • Summons $3,385.65
  • Letter GT 28/8/91 Tfer to Kyneton
  • Letter to Council 4/12/91 GT will seek strike out plus costs
  • Letter – 8/11/91 – Council does not intend to proceed
  • Letter – 12/11/91 Council seek adjournment
  • Letter 11/12/91 – Council Withdraws & pays costs

• 2000 Rates Claim
  • See 2009 Rates Claim.

• 2009 Rates Claim
  • Council Seals Crooked Plans 21/05/80 with requirement
  • Crooked Plans filed by Palmer Stevens & Rennick
  • Notice of Disposition — Parent title – with typo – 124684
  • Letter from Titles Office – Re: Crooked Plans requesting fresh application from Thompson – GT Refused
  • Amended Complaint $25,161.07
  • Council Outline of Submissions – See Paragraphs 4 to 7
  • Defence
  • Certificate – Peter Johnson – Council CEO – Asserts Parent title previously described according to crooked plan numbers
  • Rate Book
  • Rate Notices – Parent Title with typo – Lodged Plan 124604
  • Lodged Plan 124604 – Parish of Dunbalk – County of Buln Buln
  • Rate Notices – 1983-1991 Nonexistent properties
  • Rate Notice 92-93 Aggregated Value – Nonexistent properties $90,000 – Outstanding supposed rates $4731.54
  • Rate Notice 93-94 – Parent Title – Aggregated Value of Nonexistent properties & supposed rates on Nonexistent properties fraudulently transferred
  • Rate Notice 2000 – Value $40,500 – Only property in Australia to reduce in value by more than 50% between 1994 and 2000
  • Glenn Thompson – Submission as to fact & Law